Syntactic Constructions with Compositional Unions in Homilies of Kirill of Turov. 2

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the syntactic constructions with the composing conjunctions in the Homilies of the Old Russian writer of the XII century Kiril of Turov, who created the original works, continuing the Byzantine rhetorical traditions. The syntax of the works of Kiril has not been considered by the researchers before. The second part of the article is devoted to the text-forming role of the conjunctions in Homilies of Kiril. The conjunction и does not participate in the organization of microtexts of rhetorical works. It has the semantics of a high degree of generality and conveys the relations of the connection and the association, organizing the text as a whole. It is used to connect the parts of the polypredicative syntactic constructions, as well as to organize the rows of word-combinations that make up the fragments of Homilies. The such chains, sometimes very long, are characteristic of the various works of the Old Russian writer, and more often the word-combinations are connected by a non-union connection. The conjunctions a and но are the text-forming means in separate the fragments, including the monologue. The both conjunctions can act in such a function due to the semantics of the comparison and the opposition, which implies the possibility of choice. Usually a minitext with the these conjunctions consists of a different number of the complex binary constructions; the their parts are compared or opposed to each other. Thus in «The Sermon of the Blind Man» with the help of the conjunctions a the Old Russian writer builds the monologue of the elders, which acquires a the special syntactic expressiveness. To avoid monotony, Kiril interrupts the similar paired constructions with a predicative unit different in the structure or the semantics.  The conjunction но in the Homilies of Kiril can contrast not the one sentence, but the multiple predicative units connected by a non-union. The conjunctions thus refers to all predicative units at once and acts as a sphere-phrase. 

About the authors

I. I. Makeeva

Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: irinamakeeva2007@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-3181-6500
Moscow

References

  1. Iokoiama O. K analizu russkikh sochinitel’nykh soiuzov. Logicheskii analiz iazyka: Protivorechivost’ i anomal’nost’ teksta, ed. N.D. Arutiunova, Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990, pp. 190–194. (In Russ.).
  2. Istoricheskaia grammatika russkogo iazyka: Sintaksis. Slozhnoje predlozhenije, ed. V.I. Borkovskii. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979, 461 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Istrina Je.S. Sintaksicheskije iavleniia Sinodal’nogo spiska 1-i Novgorodskoi letopisi. Petrograd, 1923, 204 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Jefimova V.S. Nъ i drugije soiuzy v staroslavianskom. Slavianskije sоchinitel’nyje soiuzy, ed. T.M. Nikolajeva. Moscow, ISB Publ., 1997, pp. 62–77. (In Russ.).
  5. Kruchinina I.N. Tekstoobrazuiushchije funktsii sochinitel’noi sviazi. Russkii iazyk: Funktsionirovanije grammaticheskikh kategorii: Tekst i kontekst, ed. N.Iu. Shvedova. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, pp. 204–210. (In Russ.).
  6. Kruchinina I.N. Struktura i funktsii sochinitel’noi sviazi v russkom iazyke. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2009, 216 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Popov P.V. Sochinitel’nyje konstruktsii s soiuzom «A» v drevnerusskom iazyke. Avtoreferat … kand. filol. nauk. Leningrad, 1953, 20 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Struktura predlozheniia v istorii vostochnoslavianskikh iazykov, ed. V.I. Borkovskii, Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983, 303 p. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences