Use of Various Fertilizers to Increase the Yield of Maze in the Stavropol Krai
- Authors: Bagrintseva V.N.1, Ivashenenko I.N.1, Dridiger V.V.1, Serova O.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- All-Russian Research Scientific Institute of Corn
- Issue: No 9 (2024)
- Pages: 28-35
- Section: Experimental Articles
- URL: https://modernonco.orscience.ru/0002-1881/article/view/647197
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188124090039
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CCZGQL
- ID: 647197
Cite item
Abstract
In 2021–2023, in the experimental field of the All-Russian Corn Research Institute in the zone of sufficient moisture in the Stavropol Krai the effectiveness of pre-sowing application of ammonium nitrate (N30) and nitroammophoska (N30P30K30) to the soil was studied in comparison with non-root fertilization of maze plants in the 8-leaf phase with Batr Zinc fertilizer (1.0 l/ha). On average, over the period of 3 years, the height of Mashuk 220 MV hybrid plants increased from ammonium nitrate by 12, nitroammophoska by 17, from fertilizing with Batr Zinc fertilizer by 16 cm, Mashuk 355 MV hybrid – by 19, 23 and 23 cm, respectively. From the listed fertilizers, green mass yield increases were obtained: on average for 3 years, for the Mashuk 220 MV hybrid they amounted to 5.0, 6.7, 6.0 t/ha, respectively, and for the Mashuk 355 MV hybrid – 4.1, 7.0, 6.8 t/ha. Fertilizers increased grain yields annually. The average grain yield increase of Mashuk 220 MV hybrid from ammonium nitrate was 0.64, from nitroammophoska – 0.40, from Batr Zinc fertilizer – 0.63 t/ha. The grain yield of Mashuk 355 MV hybrid from fertilizers increased by 0.71, 0.81 and 0.74 t/ha, respectively. The cost of using ammonium nitrate as a fertilizer amounted to 2566.96, nitroammophoska – 8001.87 rub./ha. The cost of carrying out foliar fertilization of corn plants with Batr Zinc fertilizer amounted to 1030.69 rub./ha. The cost of using nitroammophoska did not pay off with an increase in grain yield. Fertilizing plants of Mashuk 220 MV hybrid with Batr Zinc fertilizer for every 1 rub. of costs gave an income of 6.33 rub., Mashuk 355 MV hybrid – 7.62 rub., which was 3.2–3.3 times more than the introduction of ammonium nitrate into the soil.
Keywords
Full Text

About the authors
V. N. Bagrintseva
All-Russian Research Scientific Institute of Corn
Author for correspondence.
Email: maize-techno@mail.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Ermolova 14o, Pyatigorsk 357528
I. N. Ivashenenko
All-Russian Research Scientific Institute of Corn
Email: maize-techno@mail.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Ermolova 14o, Pyatigorsk 357528
V. V. Dridiger
All-Russian Research Scientific Institute of Corn
Email: maize-techno@mail.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Ermolova 14o, Pyatigorsk 357528
O. D. Serova
All-Russian Research Scientific Institute of Corn
Email: maize-techno@mail.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Ermolova 14o, Pyatigorsk 357528
References
- Усанова З.И., Шальнов И.В., Васильев А.С. Влияние расчетных доз удобрений и густоты стояния на продуктивность кукурузы, вынос и хозяйственный баланс основных элементов питания // Земледелие. 2016. № 3. С. 23–26.
- Чекмарев П.А., Фомин В.Н., Турнин С.Л. Влияние удобрений на пищевой режим почвы и химический состав зерна гибридов кукурузы // Земледелие. 2017. № 8. С. 14–14.
- Багринцева В.Н., Ивашененко И.Н. Влияние погодных условий в Ставропольском крае на эффективность доз азотного удобрения на кукурузе // Агрохимия. 2020. № 2. С. 85–92.
- Багринцева В.Н., Ивашененко И.Н. Влияние некорневой подкормки растений удобрением Батр Цинк на формирование урожая кукурузы в Ставропольском крае // Рос. сел.-хоз. наука. 2022. № 6. С. 24–27.
- Адаев Н.Л., Хамзатова М.Х., Амаева А.Г. Интенсификация системы удобрения кукурузы в условиях орошения в Чеченской Республике // Кукуруза и сорго. 2019. № 2. С. 14–21.
- Васин В.Г., Кошелев И.К. Урожайность и кормовые достоинства гибридов кукурузы при внесении минеральных удобрений и стимуляторов роста // Вестн. Ульяновск. ГСХА. 2018. № 2(42). С. 45–53.
- Семина С.А., Гаврюшина И.В. Влияние препаратов с микроэлементами на морфобиометрические показатели и урожайность кукурузы // Агрохим. вестн. 2017. № 6. С. 43–46.
- Shabana E., Shahid J., Ifra S. Effect of humic acid foliar spraying and nitrogen fertilizers management on wheat yield // Inter. J. Agron. Agricult. Res. 2014. V. 4. P. 28–33.
- Егоров В.С., Дзержинская А.А. Фолиарное применение удобрений и механизм их поступления в растения // Пробл. агрохим. и экол. 2015. № 2. С. 51–57.
- Jakab P., Odry L., Monostori T. Influence of foliar fertilization on yield and grain quality of corn // Rev. Agricult. Rural Develop. 2021. № 1–2(10). P. 115–120.
- Palai J.B., Jena J., Lenka S.K. Growth, yield and nutrient of maize as affected by zinc application // Ind. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2020. № 8(2). P. 332–339.
- Hekmat A.W., Mohammadi N.K., Ghosh G. Effect of NPK, biofertilizer and zinc foliar nutrition on growth and growth attributes of baby corn (Zea mays L.) // Inter. J. Chem. Stud. 2019. № 7(4). P. 2432–2436.
- Martinez-Cuesta N., Carciochi W., Sainz-Rozas H. Effect of zinc application strategies on maize grain yield and zinc concentration in mollisols // J. Plant Nutr. 2021. № 4(44). P. 486–497.
- Шмалько И.А., Багринцева В.Н. Урожай и окупаемость удобрений при корневом и некорневом питании растений кукурузы // Сибир. вестн. сел.-хоз. науки. 2022. Т. 52. № 3. С. 17–23. doi: 10.26898/0370-8799-2022-3-2
- Hu Y., Burcus Z., Schmidhalter U. Effect of foliar fertilization application on the growth and mineral nutrient content of maize seedlings under drought and salinity // Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2008. V. 54. P. 133–141.
Supplementary files
