Assessment of the influence of the metabolitic probiotic Biosib METAPRO on protein metabolism indicators in broiler chickens
- Authors: Shvydkov A.N.1,2, Sebezhko O.I.1, Kalmykova A.I.1, Gulyaeva Y.A.2, Tkachev A.D.1,2, Kozhevnikova P.E.1,2, Alexandrova D.A.1, Domnysheva V.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
- PA Sibbiopharm LLC
- Issue: No 6 (2024)
- Pages: 89-96
- Section: Zootechnics
- URL: https://modernonco.orscience.ru/2500-2082/article/view/659232
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2500208224060194
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WSNCSK
- ID: 659232
Cite item
Abstract
The paper presents data on the study of the influence of the metabolic probiotic (metaprobiotic) Biosib METAPRO, developed based on a complex of cultures Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus plantarum at LLC “Sibbiopharm”, on the indicators of protein metabolism in broiler chickens. The study was conducted on Ross 308 cross chickens from 6 days to 35 days of age, using four groups: control and three experimental groups, to which Biosib METAPRO was additionally administered in different doses. The quantitative assessment of protein metabolism indicators in the blood serum of birds was performed photometrically using Vector-Best reagent kits. It was established that the levels of total protein, albumin, globulin, albumin/globulin ratio, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), de Ritis coefficient, and creatinine in broiler chickens were within the generally accepted physiological norms for birds of this age or showed insignificant deviations. Statistical analysis revealed a significant influence of the metaprobiotic on total protein, A/G ratio, ALT, AST, de Ritis coefficient, and creatinine. The most pronounced changes were observed in chickens receiving Biosib METAPRO at a dose of 0.05%. The greatest number of differences was found between the control and the 1st experimental (Biosib METAPRO at a dose of 0.05%) groups. When administering the preparation at this dosage to broiler chickens, the level of total protein increases by 9.97 g/l, there is a change in A/G ratio, an increase in ALT activity by 1.32 mmol/l⋅h, a decrease in AST by 3.76 mmol/l⋅h, normalization of the de Ritis coefficient, and an increase in the level of creatinine by 13.2 µmol/l (p<0.05). The results of the study demonstrate the positive influence of the metabolic probiotic Biosib METAPRO on protein metabolism in broiler chickens, which may contribute to increasing the efficiency and sustainability of poultry meat production.
Full Text

About the authors
A. N. Shvydkov
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University; PA Sibbiopharm LLC
Author for correspondence.
Email: humertrack@mail.ru
Grand PhD in Agricultural Sciences
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk regionO. I. Sebezhko
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Email: humertrack@mail.ru
PhD in Biological Sciences
Russian Federation, NovosibirskA. I. Kalmykova
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Email: humertrack@mail.ru
Grand PhD in Biological Science
Russian Federation, NovosibirskYu. A. Gulyaeva
PA Sibbiopharm LLC
Email: humertrack@mail.ru
PhD in Chemical Science
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk regionA. D. Tkachev
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University; PA Sibbiopharm LLC
Email: humertrack@mail.ru
PhD Student
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk regionP. E. Kozhevnikova
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University; PA Sibbiopharm LLC
Email: humertrack@mail.ru
Master Student
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk regionD. A. Alexandrova
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Email: humertrack@mail.ru
PhD Student
Russian Federation, NovosibirskV. V. Domnysheva
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Email: humertrack@mail.ru
PhD Student
Russian Federation, NovosibirskReferences
- Gabalov K.P., Stremousov V.M., Gritchin A.V. i dr. Biohimicheskie pokazateli krovi cyplyat v norme i pri infekcionnoj patologii // Infekcionnye bolezni zhivotnyh i antimikrobnye sredstva, Saratov, 10 noyabrya 2016 goda. Saratov: Saratovskij gosudarstvennyj agrarnyj universitet im. N.I. Vavilova, 2016. S. 71–76. EDN: XCKJZF.
- Demeneva A.E., Trebuhov A.V., Burceva S.V. Profilaktika narusheniya belkovogo obmena u cyplyat // Vestnik Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023. № 4 (222). S. 79–85.
- Dzhambulatova K.D. Sostoyanie obmena veshchestv u cyplyat-brojlerov na fone primeneniya probiotikov // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023. № 1 (99). S. 245–248.
- Jyldyrym E.A., Il’ina L.A., Tyurina D.G. i dr. CHem zamenit’ antibiotiki v pticevodstve? // Pticevodstvo. 2020. № 9. S. 41–46.
- Luneva A.V. Vliyanie kormovoj mikrobnoj dobavki na myasnuyu produktivnost’ cyplyat-brojlerov i kachestvo myasa pticy /Agrarnyj vestnik Urala. 2021. № 10 (213). S. 55–64.
- Metodika provedeniya nauchnyh i proizvodstvennyh issledovanij po kormleniyu sel’skohozyajstvennoj pticy. Molekulyarno-geneticheskie metody opredeleniya mikroflory kishechnika / Pod obshchej red. V.I. Fisinina. Sergiev Posad : VNITIP, 2013. 52 s.
- Morozov I.N., Sebezhko O.I., Tarasenko E.I., Klimanova E.A. Fenotipicheskaya izmenchivost’ aktivnosti fermentov polnovozrastnyh ovcematok romanovskoj porody v usloviyah Kuzbassa // Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2022. T. 36, № 6. S. 61–65. EDN: BCMXUI. https://doi.org/10.53859/02352451_2022_36_6_61
- Nikulin V.N. i dr. Osobennosti azotistogo i mineral’nogo obmena u kur pod dejstviem probiotika i soli joda // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023. № 1 (99). S. 352–358.
- Savkina L. Rynok myasa pticy: itogi 2023 goda [Elektronnyj resurs] // Cenovik: [sajt]. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.tsenovik.ru/articles/obzory-i-prognozy/rynok-myasa-ptitsy-itogi-2023-goda/?ysclid=lxradygtsx801385642. Data obrashcheniya: 21.06.2024.
- Sebezhko O.I., Narozhnyh K.N., Konovalova T.V. i dr. Vliyanie genotipa bykov-proizvoditelej golshtinskoj porody na uroven’ nekotoryh pokazatelej azotistogo obmena potomstva v usloviyah Zapadnoj Sibiri // Vestnik NGAU. 2020. № 1(54). S. 72–81. EDN: EAIYQZ. https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2020-54-1-72-81
- Harlap S.Yu., Derho M.A. Harakteristika adaptacionnogo potenciala cyplyat krossa “Loman-belyj” // Agroprodovol’stvennaya politika Rossii. 2015. № 6(42). S. 62–67. EDN: UJUSRZ.
- Abdallah A, Elemba E, Zhong Q, Sun Z. Gastrointestinal Interaction between Dietary Amino Acids and Gut Microbiota: With Special Emphasis on Host Nutrition // Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2020. No. 21(8). P. 785–798. PMID: 32048965 Review. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203721666200212095503
- Fan P., Li L., Rezaei A. et al. Metabolites of Dietary Protein and Peptides by Intestinal Microbes and their Impacts on Gut. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2015. No. 16(7). P. 646–54. PMID: 26122784 Review. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203716666150630133657
- Krysiak K., Konkol D., Korczyński M. Overview of the use of probiotics in poultry production // Animals. 2021. T. 11. № 6. S. 16–20.
- Kuznetsova A.R. et al. Key factors in the development of the poultry industry in the Russian Federation // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2019. T. 315. № 2. S. 022096.
- Sebezhko O.I., Mayer R.V., Tarasenko E.I. et al. Protein status of holshtinized black and white cattle // Bio web of conferences: International Scientific and Practical Conference “Fundamental Scientific Research and Their Applied Aspects in Biotechnology and Agriculture” (FSRAABA 2021), Tyumen, 19–20 iyulya 2021 goda. Tyumen: EDP Sciences, 2021. P. 06023. EDN: EKWHJH.
- Smolovskaya O., Pleshkov V., Zubova T., Bormina L. Probiotics in Industrial Poultry Farming // American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2023. Vol. 18, No. 1. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2023.1.8.
- Vertiprakhov V. G. et al. The Exocrine Pancreatic Function in Chicken (Gallus Gallus L.) Fed Diets Supplemented with Different Vegetable Oils //Agricultural Biology. 2020. T. 55. № 4. S. 726–737.
- Wang J, Ji H. Influence of Probiotics on Dietary Protein Digestion and Utilization in the Gastrointestinal Tract // Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2019. No. 20(2). P. 125–131. PMID: 29769003 Review. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203719666180517100339
- Zhang K, Wang N, Lu L, Ma X. Fermentation and Metabolism of Dietary Protein by Intestinal Microorganisms // Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2020. No. 21(8). P. 807–811. PMID: 32048966 Review. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203721666200212095902
Supplementary files
