Codification of Private International Law of France: evolution of conflict-of-laws regulation
- Autores: Erpyleva N.Y.1, Getman-Pavlova I.V.1, Kasatkina A.S.1
-
Afiliações:
- Higher School of Economics
- Edição: Nº 8 (2025)
- Páginas: 138-153
- Seção: Law and international relations
- URL: https://modernonco.orscience.ru/1026-9452/article/view/689790
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945225080141
- ID: 689790
Citar
Texto integral



Resumo
In March 2022, the draft Code of Private International Law of France was published. This project is a huge event not only for France, but also for the entire global legal community. If the Code is adopted, its entry into force will radically change the French Private International Law and will have a serious impact on the further development of codification processes both in other European countries and within the European Union as a whole. The purpose of this article is to familiarize the Russian readers with the history of the codification of French Private International Law, with the general concept and structure of the 2022 draft, focusing on a fundamental innovation in assessing the nature of conflict-of-laws rules. In modern French practice, conflict-of-laws rules are optional (except for the rules defining the competent law on personal status and legal capacity) and are applied by judges at their own discretion. The draft records the imperative nature of conflict-of-laws rules – the judge is obliged to apply them in all situations where the dispute affects the sphere of Private International Law. The 2022 draft as a whole is a full-scale comprehensive autonomous codification of Private International Law, built according to the classic “Cheshire triad”: definition of competent jurisdiction – definition of competent law – recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. At the same time, the draft structure is not rigid, but takes into account the special place of the general provisions of Private International Law and security measures. The volume of the draft is 207 articles, thus exceeding the current national codifications in other countries. The tasks set in the study are solved using a proven legal methodology – historical, formal logical and comparative legal methods. It is concluded that despite the active universal and regional unification processes of Private International Law, its national dimension does not lose its positions, and the national codification of Private International Law remains in demand and relevant. Unfortunately, in three years after the publication of the 2022 draft, there is no official data on its movement, and there is a possibility that its fate will be a repeat of the fate of the three previous drafts of Private International Law Code.
Texto integral

Sobre autores
Natalia Erpyleva
Higher School of Economics
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: natasha.erpyleva@rambler.ru
Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Legal Regulation of Business of the Faculty of Law
Rússia, 20, Myasnitskaya St., Moscow, 101000Irina Getman-Pavlova
Higher School of Economics
Email: getmanpav@mail.ru
PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Legal Regulation of Business of the Faculty of Law
Rússia, 20, Myasnitskaya St., Moscow, 101000Alexandra Kasatkina
Higher School of Economics
Email: akasatkina@hse.ru
PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Legal Regulation of Business Faculty of Law
Rússia, 20, Myasnitskaya St., Moscow, 101000Bibliografia
- Levenson P. Heiresses of the Russian tax collector before the Paris court. The case of Ms. Vuich, Garfunkel and Rabinovich // Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. 1879. Book 3 (May – June). Pp. 37–62 (in Russ.).
- Tarikanov D. V. Foreign judicial decisions on personal status in the French legal order // Law. 2022. No. 11. P. 189 (in Russ.).
- Tarikanov D. V. Method of procedural recognition as the antipode of the conflict of laws method in Private International Law // Public International and Private International Law. 2022. No. 6. Pp. 25–29 (in Russ.).
- Ancel B. Histoire du droit international privé. Paris, 2008. Pp. 10, 54.
- Billarant S. The French Diptych on Foreign Law: An Analysis through Its Most Recent Retouching // Yearbook оf Private International Law. 2006. Vol. VIII. Pp. 219–221.
- Clavel S., Saclay P. Projet de code de DIP [Electronic resource]. Available at URL: https://www.dalloz-actualite.fr/dossier/projet-de-code-de-dip (accessed: 15.05.2025).
- Corneloup S. France – The Evolving Balance Between the Judge and the Parties in France / Y. Nishitani (еd.) Treatment of Foreign Law – Dynamics towards Convergence? (Ius Comparatum – Global Studies in Comparative Law Series, 26). Springer International Publishing, 2017. Рp. 162, 163, 165–168.
- Débats parlementaires: Questions – Réponses Assemblée nationale // Nationale journal officiel de la République Française. 2024. No. 5 A.N. (Q). P. 148 [Electronic resource]. Available at URL: https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/static/16/questions/jo/jo_anq_202405.pdf (accessed: 15.05.2025).
- Delaume G. R. A Codification of French Private International Law // Canadian Bar Review. 1951. No. 29. Pp. 723, 733, 748.
- Desserre A. Le projet de Code de droit international privé passé à la loupe. 03/01/2024 [Electronic resource]. Available at URL: https://www.jss.fr/article-m.awp? P14097 (accessed: 15.05.2025).
- Fallon M. Les règles générales sur le droit applicable du projet de code à la lumière de l’expérience du code Belge // Clavel S. Projet de code de droit international privé: Effets des jugements et des actes publics étrangers. Travaux du Comité français de droit international privé, 2020–2022. Paris, 2023.
- Foussard D., Niboyet M.-L., Nourissat C. Réflexions méthodologiques sur le projet de code de droit international privé // Revue critique de droit international privé. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 479, 482, 491, 492, 495.
- Gasté J. Le droit patrimonial de la famille / Clavel S. Projet de code de droit international privé: Effets des jugements et des actes publics étrangers. Travaux du Comité français de droit international privé, 2020–2022. Paris, 2023.
- Glenn H. P. Harmonization of Law, Foreign Law and Private International Law // European Review of Private Law. 1993. Vol. 1. P. 59.
- Guillemard S., Prujiner A. La codification internationale du droit international privé: un échec? // Les Cahiers de droit. 2005. Vol. 46 (1–2). Рp. 175–192.
- Hausmann R. Pleading and Proof of Foreign Law – a Comparative Analysis // The European Legal Forum. 2008. No. 1. P. 4–6.
- Jourdan-Marques J. Projet de code de DIP et arbitrage: in or out? [Electronic resource]. Available at URL: https://www.dalloz-actualite.fr/node/projet-de-code-de-dip-et-arbitrage-iin-or-out-i (accessed: 15.05.2025).
- Lagarde P. Quelques remarques sur le projet de codification du droit international privé français // Revue critique de droit international privé. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 516, 517, 519.
- Leible S., Wilke F.-M. Le Projet de Code de Droit International Privé – A View from Germany // Revue critique de droit international privé. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 506– 509, 511, 512.
- Loussouarn Y. The French Draft on Private International Law and the French Conference on Codification of Private International Law // The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1956. Vol. 5. No. 3. Р. 393.
- Nadelmann K. H., von Mehren A. T. A French Draft of a Law on Private International Law // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1970. Vol. 18. No. 3. Рp. 614, 617–622.
- Remy B. Les codifications récentes du droit international privé // Revue internationale de droit comparé. 2010. No. 2. Рp. 291–295.
- Yöney C. Mart 2022 Tarihli Fransız Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Kanunu Tasarısının Genel Hükümlerine Dair Bazı Tespitler // Sakarya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2024. No. 12(2). Pp. 993, 1000, 1001.
Arquivos suplementares
