Accessibility of medical care in the public and private sectors of healthcare (based on the results of a sociological survey of the population of the Vologda region)

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Introduction. In the Vologda region healthcare there are complex management and economic (acute shortage of doctors) and spatial (large territory, complex settlement system) restrictions on the availability of medical care. The private health sector is an alternative to the public sector, but it expands the burden of public spending. This actualizes research aimed at assessing the availability of medical care in both sectors of the industry.

Purpose of the study. Assessment of the availability of medical care for the population of the Vologda region  in the public and private sectors.

Materials and methods. The toolkit is a questionnaire survey of the population (sample consisted of 1,500 people) conducted in the region in 2018 and 2020. The analysis is carried out by means of the distribution of respondents’ estimates, expressed in specific weights of the total amount of responses, in the comparative context of demographic and territorial groups, the public and commercial sectors of the industry. The integral index of accessibility of medical care is proposed and tested.

Results. Respondents estimate the availability of medical care/services in private medical institutions higher than in public ones (the accessibility index (AI), in 2020 was 179.6 and 163.4, respectively). During the study period, the index increased, but the gap between sectors remained. The lowest subjective estimates of accessibility were received by medical care in rural areas (AI for the public sector — 167.8, private — 179.5) and in Cherepovets (AI accounted of, respectively, 148.1 and 151.4). The highest level of accessibility was found in small towns (AI was 177.6 and 194.8).

Limitations. When studying the availability of medical care in the region, 1,500 questionnaires were evaluated, which represents a sufficient reference sample to solve the tasks set.

Conclusion. The study allowed obtaining valuable results, which, along with the developed tools (in particular, the index of accessibility of medical care), are recommended to the authorities for monitoring the situation in the healthcare of the region.

Compliance with ethical standards. The sociological survey underlying the study was voluntary. A positive conclusion was received from the Expert Commission of the Vologda Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (dated August 12, 2022), established to conduct an examination of materials for open publication.

Acknowledgment. The reported study was funded by the RFBR (project number 20-010-00852 А).

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Received: August 15, 2022
Accepted: December 15, 2022 
Published: July 06, 2023

Авторлар туралы

Konstantin Kalashnikov

Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Science

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: konstantino-84@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9558-3584

Senior Researcher,Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vologda, 160014, Russian Federation.

e-mail: konstantino-84@mail.ru

Ресей

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Kalashnikov K.N. Vector» of medical care availability: conceptualization and measurements. Nauchnyy rezul’tat. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 2018; 4(3): 4–20. https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-932X-2018-4-3-0-1 https://elibrary.ru/mkfcgt (in Russian)
  2. Penchansky R., Thomas J.W. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med. Care. 1981; 19(2): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001
  3. Standing H. Understanding the ‘demand side’ in service delivery Definitions, frameworks and tools from the health sector. DFID Health Systems Resource Centre. 2004.
  4. Ensor T., Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan. 2004; 19(2): 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czh009
  5. Andersen R.M. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J. Health Soc. Behav. 1995; 36(1): 1–10.
  6. Peters D.H., Garg A., Bloom G., Walker D.G., Brieger W.R., Rahman M.H. Poverty and access to health care in developing countries. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2008; 1136: 161–71. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1425.011
  7. Jacobs B., Ir P., Bigdeli M., Annear P.L., Van Damme W. Addressing access barriers to health services: an analytical framework for selecting appropriate interventions in low-income Asian countries. Health Policy and Planning. 2011; 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czr038
  8. Makuc D.M., Haglund B., Ingram D.D., Kleinman J.C., Feldman J.J. The Use of Health Service Areas for Measuring Provider Availability. Public Health Resources. 1991; 262. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/17269195.pdf
  9. Shartova N.V., Grishchenko M.Yu., Revich B.A. Geographical accessibility of health services based on open data in Arkhangelsk region. Sotsial’nye aspekty zdorov’ya naseleniya. 2019; 65(6): 1. https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2019-65-6-1 https://elibrary.ru/cegyrh (in Russian)
  10. Nguyen V.C., Giang T.L. Access to basic social services: an evaluation from the Viet Nam household living standard surveys. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). 2014. Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/48652/1/MPRA_paper_48652.pdf
  11. Panova L.V. Access to healthcare: Russia in the European context. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noy politiki. 2019; 17(2): 177–90. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2019-17-2-177-190 https://elibrary.ru/xvjnxd (in Russian)
  12. Mattson J. Transportation, Distance, and Health Care Utilization for Older Adults in Rural and Small Urban Areas. Small Urban & Rural Transit Center Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University, Fargo. 2010. Available at: https://www.ugpti.org/resources/reports/downloads/dp-236.pdf
  13. Ogneva E.Yu., Khal’fin R.A., Mad’yanova V.V., Tadzhiev I.Ya. Assessment of the availability and quality of medical care in municipal health care institutions. Problemy standartizatsii v zdravookhranenii. 2010; (1–2): 30–9. https://elibrary.ru/mvoffr (in Russian)
  14. Tumusov F.S., Kosenkov D.A. Current Trends in the Healthcare System of the Russian Federation [Sovremennye tendentsii v sisteme zdravookhraneniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii]. Moscow; 2019. (in Russian)
  15. Tsarik G.N., Korbanova T.N., Abrosova O.E., Ten S.B. Assessment of accessibility and quality of medical rehabilitation in the Kemerovo region. Politravma. 2017; (3): 55–63. https://elibrary.ru/zjaiph (in Russian)
  16. Kochkina N.N., Krasil’nikova M.D., Shishkin S.V. Accessibility and quality of medical care in the estimates of the population [Dostupnost’ i kachestvo meditsinskoy pomoshchi v otsenkakh naseleniya]. Moscow; 2015. (in Russian)
  17. Blinova V.V., Bogdanova T.M., Vologina A.P., Semenova V.A., Zankin M.A. Satisfaction of the rural population with the quality of medical care. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2021; 65(3): 208–13. https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197X-2021-65-3-208-213 https://elibrary.ru/yfcsqn (in Russian)

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Kalashnikov K.N., 2023

Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.