Crisis line strategy of public health for suicide prevention: problems and solutions

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. It has been about 40 years since Russian public healthcare used the telephone crisis line for suicide prevention. The crisis line is a crucial support resource for people in emotional crises and decreases suicidal rates — however, few problems need to be solved to optimize crisis line service.

The purpose is to reveal limitations and find possible ways of improvement emergent help for people with suicidal behaviour example, the crisis line of Krasnoyarsk Area Psychoneurologic Dispensary № 1.

Material and methods. Crisis line service telephone calls over nine years (2011–2019) were analyzed. Total number of calls, number of calls with emotional crisis and suicidal behaviour, calls structure and their multiplicity. IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 22 was used for statistical analysis of data.

Results. Total number of calls over nine years (2011–2019) was 21.496, of the 1.327 calls from the crisis patients (3.8–9.0% of all calls) and 574 calls from the patients with suicide behaviour (1.8–3.6% of all calls). Most calls were regarding psychological problems (36.5%), receive information (27.5%) and calls regarding psychiatric or somatic health (27.5%).

Conclusion. Low proportion of crisis and suicidal calls reflects insufficient population coverage with targeted assistance. In order to improve the abilities of the crisis counselling line, we suggest patronage of patients with suicidal attempts after discharge to prevent its recurrence. A risk management strategy using a crisis line will improve the efficacy of suicide prevention measures.

About the authors

Nadezhda B. Semenova

Krasnoyarsk Scientific Centre of Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Research Institute for Medical Problems of the North

Author for correspondence.
Email: snb237@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6120-7860

MD, PhD, DSci., Leading Researcher of the Krasnoyarsk Scientific Centre of Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russian Federation.

e-mail: snb237@gmail.com

Russian Federation

References

  1. Aminov I. Suicides in Russia: 15 facts. Demoskop Weekly. 2018; 783–4. Available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2018/0783/suicide.php (in Russian)
  2. Aminov I. Suicides and their prevention in Russia, 2018: key facts. Demoskop Weekly. 2019; 823–4. Available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2019/0823/suicide.php (in Russian)
  3. Govorin N.V., Sakharov A.V., Stupina O.P., Tarasova O.A. Epidemiology of suicide in Transbaikalian territory, organization of assistance to the population. Suitsidologiya. 2013; 4(1): 48–54. (in Russian)
  4. Polozhiy B.S., Kuular L.Y., Dukten-ool S.M. Peculiarities of suicidal situation in the regions with ultrahigh suicide rate (on an example of the republic of Tyva). Suitsidologiya. 2014; 5(1): 11–8. (in Russian)
  5. Lyubov E.B., Morev M.V., Falaleeva O.I. Social-economic burden of suicides in Russia. Suitsidologiya. 2011; (2): 41–3. (in Russian)
  6. Lyubov E.B. Clinical and social burden for suicide survivors: if I had dealt with it properly. Suitsidologiya. 2017; 8(4): 56–76. (in Russian)
  7. Suicide Prevention: A Global Imperative. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
  8. Lyubov E.B., Tsuprun V.E. The century, time and place of Professor Ambrumova in Russian suicidology. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii. 2013; (2). Available at: http://medpsy.ru (in Russian)
  9. Vattø I.E., Lien L., DeMarinis V., Kjørven Haug S.H., Danbolt L.J. Caught between expectations and the practice field. Crisis. 2019; 40(5): 340–6. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000573
  10. Lyubov E.B., Tsuprun V.E., Kabizulov V.S., Chubina S.A. Territorial suicidological services of Russia: problems and solutions. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii. 2014; (5). (in Russian)
  11. Ohtaki Y., Oi Y., Doki S., Kaneko H., Usami K., Sasahara S., et al. Characteristics of telephone crisis hotline callers with suicidal ideation in Japan. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2017; 47(1): 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12264
  12. Chan C.H., Wong H.K., Yip P.S. Exploring the use of telephone helpline pertaining to older adult suicide prevention: a Hong Kong experience. J. Affect Disord. 2018; 236: 75–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.093
  13. Shaw F.F., Chiang W.H. An evaluation of suicide prevention hotline results in Taiwan: caller profiles and the effect on emotional distress and suicide risk. J. Affect Disord. 2019; 244: 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.050
  14. Vorsina O.P. Work experience of the helpline children’s line in the city of Irkutsk. Sotsial’naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya. 2012; 22(4): 80–2. (in Russian)
  15. Gould M.S., Kalafat J., Harrismunfakh J.L., Kleinman M. An evaluation of crisis hotline outcomes. Part 2: Suicidal callers. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2007; 37(3): 338–52. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.338
  16. Tyson P., Law C., Reed S., Johnsey E., Aruna O., Hall S. Preventing suicide and self-harm. Crisis. 2016; 37(5): 353–60. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000390
  17. Hoffberg A.S., Stearns-Yoder K.A., Brenner L.A. The effectiveness of crisis line services: a systematic review. Front. Public. Health. 2020; 7: 399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00399
  18. Iqbal Y., Jahan R., Matin M.R. Descriptive characteristics of callers to an emotional support and suicide prevention helpline in Bangladesh (first five years). Asian J. Psychiatr. 2019; 45: 63–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2019.09.005
  19. Helplines of Russia. Available at: https://www.ratepp.ru/load/ (in Russian)
  20. Suicidal behavior of minors (preventive aspects). Guidelines. Moscow; 2020. (in Russian)
  21. Pil L., Pauwels K., Muijzers E., Portzky G., Annemans L. Cost-effectiveness of a helpline for suicide prevention. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2013; 19(5): 273–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x13495487
  22. Labouliere C.D., Stanley B., Lake A.M., Gould M.S. Safety planning on crisis lines: feasibility, acceptability, and perceived helpfulness of a brief intervention to mitigate future suicide risk. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2020; 50(1): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12554
  23. Catanach B., Betz M.E., Tvrdy C., Skelding C., Brummett S., Allen M.H. Implementing an emergency department telephone follow-up program for suicidal patients: successes and challenges. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient. Saf. 2019; 45(11): 725–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.07.009
  24. Duhem S., Berrouiguet S., Debien C., Ducrocq F., Demarty A.L., Messiah A., et al. Combining brief contact interventions (BCI) into a decision-making algorithm to reduce suicide reattempt: the VigilanS study protocol. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(10): e022762. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022762
  25. Ghanbari B., Malakouti S.K., Nojomi M., Alavi K., Khaleghparast S. Suicide prevention and follow-up services: a narrative review. Glob. J. Health Sci. 2015; 8(5): 145–53. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p145
  26. Busby D.R., King C.A., Brent D., Grupp-Phelan J., Gould M., Page K., et al. Adolescents’ engagement with crisis hotline risk-management services: a report from the emergency department screen for teen suicide risk (ED-STARS) study. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2020; 50(1): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12558
  27. Zero Suicide. Available at: www.zerosuicide.com
  28. Karver M.S., Tarquini S.J., Caporino N.E. The judgment of future suicide-related behavior: helpline counselors’ accuracy and agreement. Crisis. 2010; 31(5): 272–80. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000029

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2022 Semenova N.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.