Clinical trial through the eyes of patients: benefit or unjustified risk?
- 作者: Zvonareva O.I.1,2, Kobyakova O.S.2, Pimenov I.D.2, Egorova M.Y.2, Yun V.Е.2, Loos D.M.2, Sofronov A.V.2, Zyrianov S.V.2, Bronnikova A.A.2, Tyufilin D.S.2, Kulikov E.S.2
-
隶属关系:
- Maastricht University
- Siberian State Medical University
- 期: 卷 65, 编号 2 (2021)
- 页面: 118-124
- 栏目: HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION
- ##submission.dateSubmitted##: 25.10.2024
- URL: https://modernonco.orscience.ru/0044-197X/article/view/637719
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197X-2021-65-2-118-124
- ID: 637719
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Introduction. Clinical trials (CTs) are the footing foundation of evidence-based medicine. In Russia many aspects of CT implementation remain unexplored; one of them is the attitude of Russian society.
Aims. This study aims to determine the knowledge and perception of CTs by potential participants. Analysis of the perception of CTs through the eyes of patients: CTs – is it a benefit or an unjustified risk?
Materials. The primary method of research was a questionnaire. A total of 488 anonymous, voluntary surveys of patients from hospitals in Tomsk were studied.
Results. More than half of the respondents heard about CTs, while the primary source of information was the media. The participants adequately assess the importance of conducting CTs to develop medicine and medical care for society. The primary goal of CTs is to determine the effectiveness and safety of drugs, and respondents regard their engagement as an opportunity to contribute to the development of science. The primary motivating factor in participating in CTs is receiving treatment for an incurable disease and observing conditions by a qualified doctor. The central negative aspect is the possibility of causing a risk to own health. The questionnaire demonstrated the need and importance of all points of informed consent. Several questions concerned the public attitude to researchers. According to patients, medical researchers arouse trust and confidence in altruistic motives during the CTs.
Conclusion. This study revealed a low interest of Russians in participating in CTs, except for personal benefit. The behavior of the doctors, the ability to convey reliable information to the patient to adequately assess benefits and possible risks play an important role in deciding on the involvement of patients in the CTs. The results of this work will allow us to adapt the process of organizing CTs to the needs of patients in the local context.
作者简介
Olga Zvonareva
Maastricht University; Siberian State Medical University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5548-7491
俄罗斯联邦
Olga Kobyakova
Siberian State Medical University
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0098-1403
俄罗斯联邦
Igor’ Pimenov
Siberian State Medical University
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3866-100X
俄罗斯联邦
Maria Egorova
Siberian State Medical University
Email: egorova.m.u.egorova@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3603-4774
Student of StrAU Integrative Approaches to Public Health and Healthcare, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation.
e-mail: egorova.m.u.egorova@ya.ru
俄罗斯联邦Vera Yun
Siberian State Medical University
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9127-8619
俄罗斯联邦
Dmitrij Loos
Siberian State Medical University
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4098-6076
俄罗斯联邦
Andrej Sofronov
Siberian State Medical University
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8636-6481
俄罗斯联邦
Stepan Zyrianov
Siberian State Medical University
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1352-6517
俄罗斯联邦
Anastasiya Bronnikova
Siberian State Medical University
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8981-0821
俄罗斯联邦
Denis Tyufilin
Siberian State Medical University
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9174-6419
俄罗斯联邦
Evgenij Kulikov
Siberian State Medical University
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0088-9204
俄罗斯联邦
参考
- DasMahapatra P., Raja P., Gilbert J., Wicks P. Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2017; 17(1): 166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2090-x
- Almutairi A.F., Almutairi B.M., Alturki A.S., Adlan A.A., Salam M., Al-Jeraisy M.I., et al. Public motives and willingness to participate in first-in-humanclinical trials in Saudi Arabia: A new era in the making. J. Infect. Public Health. 2019; 12(5): 673–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2019.03.013
- Choi Y.J., Beck S.H., Kang W.Y., Yoo S., Kim S.Y., Lee J.S., et al. Knowledge and perception about clinical research shapes behavior: face to face survey in Korean General Public. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2016; 31(5): 674–81. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.674
- Burt T., Dhillon S., Sharma P., Khan D., Mv D., Alam S., et al. PARTAKE survey of public knowledge and perceptions of clinical research in India. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7): e68666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068666
- Adzhienko V.L. The attitude of patients to clinical trials and to their participation in them. Bioetika. 2008; (1): 21–6. (in Russian)
- Google. Questionnaire «What I know about clinical trials?» Available at: https://goo.gl/forms/8JjPMS8D2X62pk9e2 (in Russian)
- AOKI. What you should know about clinical trials. Available at: http://acto-russia.org/index.php?id=184&option=com_content&task=view (in Russian)
- Fox S., Duggan M. Health Online; 2013. Available at: https://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
- Nimita L., Awani S. How social media is transforming pharma and healthcare: applied clinical trial. Appl. Clin. Trials. 2018; 27(2).
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. New website: NIH Clinical Research Trials and You; 2012. Available at: https://www.nih.gov/health-information/nih-clinical-research-trials-you
- CISCRP 2013 Perception & Insights Study Public and Patient Perceptions of Clinical Research; 2016.
- Lee S.J., Park L.Ch., Lee J., Kim S., Choi M.K., Hong J.Y., et al. Unique perception of clinical trials by Korean cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2012; 12: 594. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-594
- Robinson E.J., Kerr C.E., Stevens A.J., Lilford R.J., Braunholtz D.A., Edwards S.J., et al. Lay public’s understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Health Technol. Assess. 2005; 9(8): 1–192. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta9080
- Falagas M.E., Korbila I.P., Giannopoulou K.P., Kondilis B.K., Peppas G. Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? Am. J. Surg. 2009; 198(3): 420–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.02.010
- Parsons S., Starling B., Mullan-Jensen C. What the public knows and wants to know about medicines research and deve-lopment: a survey of the general public in six European countries. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4): e006420. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006420
- Melikhov O.G. What does the Russian population think about clinical trials? Remedium. 2007; (10): 10–3. (in Russian)
- Schildmeijer K., Nilsen P., Ericsson C., Broström A., Skagerström J. Determinants of patient participation for safer care: A qualitative study of physicians’ experiences and perceptions. Health Sci. Rep. 2018; 1(10): e87. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.87
- Schilling I., Behrens H., Hugenschmidt C., Liedtke J., Schmiemann G., Gerhardus A. Patient involvement in clinical trials: motivation and expectations differ between patients and researchers involved in a trial on urinary tract infections. Res. Involv. Engagem. 2019; 5: 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0145-3
- Conradie A., Duys R., Forget P., Biccard B.M. Barriers to clinical research in Africa: a quantitative and qualitative survey of clinical researchers in 27 African countries. Br. J. Anaesth. 2018; 121(4): 813–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.013
- Estcourt S., Epton J., Epton T., Vaidya B., Daly M. Exploring the motivations of patients with type 2 diabetes to participate in clinical trials: a qualitative analysis. Res. Involv. Engagem. 2016; 2: 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0050-y
- Sacristán J.A., Aguarón A., Avendaño-Solá C., Garrido P., Carrión J., Gutiérrez A., et al. Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 2016; 10: 631–40. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s104259
- Nappo S.A., Iafrate G.B., Sanchez Z.M. Motives for participating in a clinical research trial: a pilot study in Brazil. BMC Public. Health. 2013; 13: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-19
- Kass N.E., Taylor H.A., Ali J., Hallez K., Chaisson L. A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: Feasibility, approach, and results. Clin. Trials. 2015; 12(1): 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774514560831
- Nishimura A., Carey J., Erwin P.J., Tilburt J.C., Murad M.H., McCormick J.B. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: A systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Med. Ethics. 2013; 14: 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-28
- Wendler D. «Targeted» consent for pragmatic clinical trials. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2015; 30(5): 679–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3169-2
- Spellecy R., Leuthner S., Farrell M. Risk, respect for persons, and informed consent in comparative effectiveness research. Am. J. Bioeth. 2013; 13(12): 46–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.851299
- Anderson E.E., Newman S.B., Matthews A.K. Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views. AJOB Empir. Bioeth. 2017; 8(3): 178–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2017.1362488
- El Obaid Y., Al Hamiz A., Abdulle A., Hayes R.B., Sherman S., Ali R. Perceptions and attitudes towards medical research in the United Arab Emirates: Results from the Abu Dhabi Cohort Study (ADCS) focus group discussions. PloS One. 2016; 11(3): e0149609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149609
补充文件
