Protection of children’s health in the environment of Russian emigration and the USSR in the conditions of the spread of infectious diseases in the 1920s–1930s

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Introduction. The preservation of children’s health is an important state task, the success of which is largely determined by the socio-cultural context, traditions in the application of preventive measures and the provision of medical care. In this regard, it is indicative of the comparison of measures to preserve the health of schoolchildren in the “Russian schools” of the emigrant environment (on the example of schools in the Czechoslovakia and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia) and Soviet schools in the 1920s and 1930s in the conditions of the spread of infectious diseases.

Materials and methods. The data sources were published reports of Russian educational institutions in exile, which contain information about the health of schoolchildren, data on the health of Soviet schoolchildren were obtained from collections of analytical works of the specified period.

Results. The prevalence of infectious diseases in children among Russian emigration and in the USSR was comparable, with the exception of measles, cases of which were not recorded in emigrant educational institutions in the Czechoslovakia and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. As the main preventive measures, disinfection and examinations were carried out, vaccinations were made. The living conditions of emigrants contributed to the spread of tuberculosis, the incidence of which among children of emigrants was higher than among the European population. Soviet and emigrant doctors agreed that the fight against infectious diseases should develop at the level of organized collectives (schools, kindergartens).

Conclusion. Thus, emigrant doctors largely followed the medical traditions and experience that had developed in pre-revolutionary Russia. Nevertheless, the living conditions of emigrants and the lack of funds became factors that reduced the effectiveness of preventive measures and medical care. An important difference was that the events in the Soviet Union were carried out within the framework of the state policy on health protection, and in the emigrant environment were of a local nature, determined as a rule by the capabilities of specific educational institutions.

Contribution of the authors:
Klimovich L.V. — research concept and design, collection and processing of material, writing the text, statistical data processing;
Suvorov V.V. — collection and processing of material, writing the text, compilation of the list of literature;
Shaipak L.A. — writing the text, editing;
Kiselev A.R. — writing the text, editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Acknowledgment. The study had no sponsorship.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 Received: February 8, 2023 / Accepted: April 12, 2023 / Published: August 29, 2024

About the authors

Lyudmila V. Klimovich

Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after I. Ulyanov

Author for correspondence.
Email: lusek84@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3541-7159

DSc, Professor, Department of history, Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after I. Ulyanov, Ulyanovsk, 432071, Russian Federation

e-mail: lusek84@yandex.ru

Russian Federation

Valery V. Suvorov

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Email: valeriy_s@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4181-9034

PhD, researcher at the Coordinating Center for Fundamental Research of the National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation

e-mail: valeriy_s@inbox.ru

Russian Federation

Leonid A. Shaipak

Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after I. Ulyanov

Email: shaipak@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1114-2579

PhD, DSci., Professor of the Department of history, Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after I. Ulyanov, Ulyanovsk, 432071, Russian Federation

e-mail: shaipak@rambler.ru

Russian Federation

Anton R. Kiselev

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Email: antonkis@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3967-3950

MD, PhD, DSci., Professor, Head of the Coordinating Center for Fundamental Research of the National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation

e-mail: antonkis@list.ru

Russian Federation

References

  1. Andriyanova E.A., Zavialov A.I., Rajkova S.V., Suvorov V.V. The contribution of medical communities and rural doctors to the development of sanitary care in the Saratov province in the second half of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century. History of Medicine. 2018; 5(4): 278-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/hmj.5.4.35688
  2. Suvorov V.V., Ishchenko Yu.V., Fakhrudinova E.R., Kiselev A.R. Regulation of medical activity in Russia and Europe in the 10th — early 20th centuries: correlation between ethical and legal principles. Russian Open Medical Journal 2022; 11: e0416. https://doi.org/10.15275/rusomj.2022.0416
  3. Suvorov V.V., Kiselev A.R., Fedonnikov A.S. Tibetan medicine with respect to increased attention to the East in Russian society: the second half of the nineteenth century to early twentieth century. Medical History. 2021; 65(1): 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2020.46
  4. Klimovich L.V., Suvorov V.V., Shaipak L.A. International committee of the red cross: supporting, protecting, and providing medical care to Russian emigrants in the 1920s-1930s Russian Open Medical Journal. 2020; 9: e0420. https://doi.org/10.15275/rusomj.2020.0420
  5. Klimovich L.V., Suvorov V.V. The spread of tuberculosis in the student milieu of Russian emigrants in Czechoslovakia in the 1920s: statistics, control measures, outcomes. Russian Open Medical Journal. 2019; 8(4): e0414. https://doi.org/10.15275/rusomj.2019.0414
  6. Annual report of the Russian reformed real gymnasium in Moravska Trzhebov for the 1927-1928 academic year. In Archive: State Archive of the Russian Federation. Collection 10003. Microfilm collection of the Hoover Institution for War, Revolution and Peace. Inventory 12. Wrangel M.D. Case 24. (in Russian).
  7. The first Russian-Serbian gymnasium. 1920-1930. Belgrade. In Archive: State Archive of the Russian Federation. Collection 10003. Microfilm collection of the Hoover Institution for War, Revolution and Peace. Inventory 12. Wrangel M.D. Case 24. (in Russian).
  8. Shendeleva S.V., Kosareva S.G. Problems of Formation of Students’ Health in the Historical and Pedagogical Aspect (on the Example of the Soviet School of 1918–1941). In: Innovative Technologies in Technology and Education: Proceedings of the X International Scientific and Practical Conference. Volume 1 [Innovatsionnye tekhnologii v tekhnike i obrazovanii: Materialy X Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Tom 1]. Chita; 2018: 155–64. https://elibrary.ru/zcdrzj (in Russian)
  9. Klimovich L., Suvorov V., Shaipak L. Everyday life of teachers and students at the Russian School in Paris in the mirror of 1920s-1930s correspondence. History of Education & Children’s Literature. 2022; 17(1): 215-25.
  10. Klimovich L.V. The Russian School in Emigration in the 1920–1930s: Problems of Formation and Functioning (on the Example of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes). Pravo i obrazovanie. 2019; (2): 134–41. https://elibrary.ru/yvyjrr (in Russian)
  11. Klimovich L.V. The contribution of the Russian school to the formation of the national and cultural identity of the young generation of emigration in the 20–30s. XX century (based on the materials of the Russian secondary school-gymnasium in Paris). Nauchnyi dialog. 2016; (8): 134–46. https://elibrary.ru/wjzzwl (in Russian)
  12. Kirkhope D.C. The prophylactic value of scarlet fever antitoxin. Br. Med. J. 1926; 1(3396): 214-15. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.3396.214
  13. Harries E.H., Hervey D., Fellowes V. The prophylactic value of scarlet fever antitoxin. Br. Med. J. 1926; 1(3411): 864–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.3411.864
  14. Copeman S.M. Immunization against scarlet fever. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1925; 18(Sect. Epidemiol. State Med): 51–60.
  15. BMJ. Immunization Against Scarlet Fever. Br. Med. J. 1938; 2(4053): 580–1.
  16. Albitsky V.Yu., Sher S.A. Experience in the fight against acute childhood infections in Soviet Russia (1930–1940). Byulleten’ Natsional’nogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta obshchestvennogo zdorov’ya imeni N.A. Semashko. 2021; (3): 32–7. https://doi.org/10.25742/NRIPH.2021.03.005 https://elibrary.ru/rwmyvt (in Russian)
  17. Fitzgerald J.G. The specific prevention of measles, scarlet fever and diphtheria. Can. Publ. Health J. 1933; 24(10): 455–64.
  18. Ostrovkin D.L. The Development of the Soviet Health Care System in the Urals in 1917-1941: Diss. Ekaterinburg; 2018. (in Russian)
  19. Shurpe E.Yu., Koltypin L.A., eds. Issues of Prevention of Acute Childhood Infections [Voprosy profilaktiki ostrykh detskikh infektsii]. Moscow; 1935. (in Russian)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Klimovich L.V., Suvorov V.V., Shaipak L.A., Kiselev A.R.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.