Immobilisation of protein macromolecules in biochip cells made of different polymers

Abstract

Microarrays with immobilised protein probes are used in the analysis of protein samples. Selection of materials for biochip fabrication, functionalisation of the carrier surface, obtaining ordered cell matrices, immobilisation of protein molecular probes in cells, achieving high sensitivity of protein sample analysis are the key tasks of biochip technology. The following methodological approaches were used in this work. To preserve affinity properties, protein probes were immobilised in biochip cells under ‘soft’ conditions, after cell preparation. In order to achieve high concentration and prostanse accessibility, probes were immobilised in three-dimensional cells obtained from dynamically mobile brush polymers fixed on the substrate only at one end. The cell matrix was obtained on the substrate surface by photoinduced radical polymerisation of monomers with reactive chemical groups, photolithographically, according to the photomask template. We carried out a comparative analysis of polymer brush structures prepared on a polybutylene terephthalate substrate by photoinduced radical polymerisation. These structures consisted of links of one or more monomers. The influence of the method of activation of reactive groups on the polymer chains on the efficiency of immobilisation of molecular protein probes in the cells was investigated. The influence of the composition of acrylate monomers, from which the cells were obtained, on the specific binding of response proteins to protein probes immobilised in biochip cells was studied. A new method of biochip fabrication was developed. Substrates made of photoactive polybutylene terephthalate were coated with a thin layer of photoactive polymer polyvinyl acetate. The cells, which were obtained by photopolymerisation of monomers on the modified substrate, did not degrade or peel from the surface in aqueous solutions. The substrates coated with polyvinyl acetate do not adsorb proteins. Streptavidin and human immunoglobulins were used as models of protein probes, and biotinylated goat immunoglobulins and goat antibodies against human immunoglobulins were used as response proteins. The study found that polymers with irregular structure promoted higher concentration of protein probes and their uniform distribution within the cells, which positively influenced the efficiency of specific binding to response proteins. Biochips with cells of their brush polymers on black polybutylene terephthalate substrate appear promising for further improvement for use in immunofluorescence analysis of protein targets for the development of ‘lab-on-a-chip’ microanalysis technologies.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

G. F. Shtylev

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

I. Y. Shishkin

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

V. A. Vasiliskov

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

V. E. Barsky

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

V. E. Kuznetsova

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

V. E. Shershov

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

S. A. Polyakov

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

R. A. Miftakhov

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

V. I. Butvilovskaya

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

O. A. Zasedateleva

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

A. V. Chudinov

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: chud@eimb.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

References

  1. Лысов Ю.П., Флорентьев В.Л., Хорлин А.А., Храпко К.Р., Шик В.В., Мирзабеков А.Д. (1988) Определение нуклеотидной последовательности ДНК гибридизацией с олигонуклеотидами. Новый метод. ДАН СССР. 303(6), 1508.
  2. Khrapko K.P., Ivanov I.B., Lysov Yu.P., Khorlin A.A., Shick V.V., Floreniev V.L., Mirzabekov A.D. (1989) An oligonucleotide hybridization approach to DNA sequencing. FEBS Lett. 256, 118–122.
  3. Drmanac R., Labat I., Brukner I., Crkvenjakov R. (1989) Sequencing of megabase plus DNA by hybridization: theory of the method. Genomics. 4(2), 114–128.
  4. Southern E.M., Maskos U., Elder J.K. (1992) Analyzing and comparing nucleic acid sequences by hybridization to arrays of oligonucleotides: evaluation using experimental models. Genomics. 13(4), 1008–1017.
  5. Aparna G.M., Tetala K.K.R. (2023) Recent progress in development and application of DNA, protein, peptide, glycan, antibody, and aptamer microarrays. Biomolecules. 13(4), 602.
  6. Gryadunov D., Dementieva E., Mikhailovich V., Nasedkina T., Rubina A., Savvateeva E., Fesenko E., Chudinov A., Zimenkov D., Kolchinsky A., Zasedatelev A. (2011) Gel-based microarrays in clinical diagnostics in Russia. Exp. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 11, 839–853.
  7. Varachev V., Shekhtman A., Guskov D., Rogozhin D., Zasedatelev A., Nasedkina T. (2024) Diagnostics of IDH1/2 mutations in intracranial chondroid tumors: comparison of molecular genetic methods and immunohistochemistry. Diagnostics. 14, 200.
  8. Brittain W.J., Brandstetter T., Prucker O., Rühe J. (2019) The surface science of microarray generation — a critical inventory. ACS Appl. Materials Interfaces. 11(43), 39397–39409.
  9. Rother D., Sen T., East D., Bruce I.J. (2011) Silicon, silica and its surface patterning/activation with alkoxy- and amino-silanes for nanomedical applications. Nanomedicine. 6(2), 281–300.
  10. Akkoyun A., Bilitewski U. (2002) Optimisation of glass surfaces for optical immunosensors. Biosensors Bioelectronics. 17, 655–664.
  11. Zhi Z.L., Powell A.K., Turnbull J.E. (2006) Fabrication of carbohydrate microarrays on gold surfaces: direct attachment of nonderivatized oligosaccharides to hydrazide-modified self-assembled monolayers. Analyt. Chem. 78(14), 4786–4793.
  12. Afanassiev V., Hanemann V., Wölfl S. (2000) Preparation of DNA and protein micro arrays on glass slides coated with an agarose film. Nucl. Acids Res. 28(12), E66.
  13. Dufva M., Petronis S., Jensen L.B., Krag C., Christensen C.B.V. (2004) Characterization of an inexpensive, nontoxic, and highly sensitive microarray substrate. BioTechniques. 37(2), 286–296.
  14. Straub A.J., Scherag F.D., Kim H.I., Steiner M.-S., Brandstetter T., Rühe J. (2021) “CHicable” and “Clickable” copolymers for network formation and surface modification. Langmuir. 37(21), 6510–6520.
  15. Damin F., Galbiati S., Gagliardi S., Cereda C., Dragoni F., Fenizia C., Savasi V., Sola L., Chiari M. (2021) CovidArray: a microarray based assay with high sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs. Sensors. 21, 2490.
  16. Zhou Y., Andersson O., Lindberg P., Liedberg B. (2004) Protein microarrays on carboxymethylated dextran hydrogels: immobilization, characterization and application. Microchim. Acta. 147, 21–30.
  17. Rubina A.Y., Pan’kov S.V., Dementieva E.I., Pen’kov D.N., Butygin A.V., Vasiliskov V.A., Chudinov A.V., Mikheikin A.L., Mikhailovich V.M., Mirzabekov A.D. (2004) Hydrogel drop microchips with immobilized DNA: properties and methods for large-scale production. Anal. Biochem. 325, 92–106.
  18. Shaskolskiy B., Kandinov I., Kravtsov D., Vinokurova A., Gorshkova S., Filippova M., Kubanov A., Solomka V., Deryabin D., Dementieva E., Gryadunov D. (2021) Hydrogel droplet microarray for genotyping antimicrobial resistance determinants in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates. Polymers. 13, 3889.
  19. Savvateeva E.N., Yukina M.Y., Nuralieva N.F., Filippova M.A., Gryadunov D.A., Troshina E.A. (2021) Multiplex autoantibody detection in patients with autoimmune polyglandular syndromes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 5502.
  20. Rendl M., Bönisch A., Mader A., Schuh K., Prucker O., Brandstetter T., Rühe J. (2011) Simple one-step process for immobilization of biomolecules on polymer substrates based on surface-attached polymer networks. Langmuir. 27, 6116–6123.
  21. Stumpf A., Brandstetter T., Hübner J., Rühe J. (2019) Hydrogel based protein biochip for parallel detection of biomarkers for diagnosis of a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in human serum. PLoS One. 14(12), e0225525.
  22. Zubtsov D.A., Savvateeva E.N., Rubina A. Yu., Pan’kov S.V., Konovalova E.V., Moiseeva O.V., Chechetkin V.R., Zasedatelev A.S. (2007) Comparison of surface and hydrogel-based protein microchips. Anal. Biochem. 368, 205–213.
  23. Ma H., Davis R.H., Bowman C.N. (2000) A novel sequential photoinduced living graft polymerization. Macromolecules. 33, 331–335.
  24. Pu Q., Oyesanya O., Thompson B., Liu S., Alvarez J.C. (2007) On-chip micropatterning of plastic (Cyclic Olefin Copolymer, COC) microfluidic channels for the fabrication of biomolecule microarrays using photografting methods. Langmuir. 23, 1577–1583.
  25. Spitsyn M.A., Kuznetsova V.E., Shershov V.E., Emelyanova М.А., Guseinov T.O., Lapa S.A., Nasedkina T.V., Zasedatelev A.S., Chudinov A.V. (2017) Synthetic route to novel zwitterionic pentamethine indocyanine fluorophores with various substitutions. Dyes Pigments. 147, 199–210.
  26. Lysov Y., Barsky V., Urasov D., Urasov R., Cherepanov A., Mamaev D., Yegorov Y., Chudinov A., Surzhikov S., Rubina A., Smoldovskaya O., Zasedatelev A. (2017) Microarray analyzer based on wide field fluorescent microscopy with laser illumination and a device for speckle suppression. Biomed. Optics Express. 8, 4798–4810.
  27. Штылев Г.Ф., Шишкин И.Ю., Шершов В.Е., Кузнецова В.Е., Качуляк Д.А., Бутвиловская В.И., Левашова А.И., Василисков В.А., Заседателева О.А., Чудинов А.В. (2024) Иммобилизация белковых зондов на биочипах с ячейками из щеточных полимеров. Биоорган. химия. 50(5), XX–ХX.
  28. Mueller M., Bandl C., Kern W. (2022) Surface-immobilized photoinitiators for light induced polymerization and coupling reactions. Polumers. 14, 608.
  29. Trmcic-Cvitas J., Hasan E., Ramstedt M., Li, X., Cooper M.A., Abell C., Huck W.T.S., Gautrot J.E. (2009) Biofunctionalized protein resistant oligo(ethylene glycol)derived polymer brushes as selective immobilization and sensing platforms. Biomacromolecules. 10, 2885–2894.
  30. Zilio C., Sola L., Damin F., Faggioni L., Chiari M. (2014) Universal hydrophilic coating of thermoplastic polymers currently used in microfluidics. Biomed Microdevices. 16, 107–114.
  31. Штылев Г.Ф., Шишкин И.Ю., Лапа С.А., Шершов В.Е., Барский В.Е., Поляков С.А., Василисков В.А., Заседателева О.А., Кузнецова В.Е., Чудинов А.В. (2024) Получение активных аминогрупп на поверхности полиэтилентерефталатной пленки и их количественная оценка для технологии биологических микрочипов. Биоорган. химия. 50(5), 665‒671.
  32. Мифтахов Р.А., Иконникова А.Ю., Василисков В.А., Лапа С.А., Левашова А.И., Кузнецова В.Е., Шершов В.Е., Заседателев А.С., Наседкина Т.В., Чудинов А.В. (2023) Биочип с ячейками из щеточных полимеров с реактивными карбоксильными группами для анализа ДНК. Биоорган. химия. 49(6), 641–648.
  33. Ogiwara Y., Kanda M., Takumi M., Kubota H. (1981) Photosensitized grafting on polyolefin films in vapor and liquid phases. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 19, 457–462.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Scheme for obtaining cells from brush polymers by photo-initiated radical polymerization of monomers “from the surface” under UV irradiation through a photomask using photolithography.

Download (30KB)
3. Fig. 2. Scheme of activation of hydroxyl groups of polymer chains in cells of PEGMA (n = 5–6), HEMA (n = 1) and binding with Cy5-NH2 dye.

Download (41KB)
4. Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of the structure of fluorescent dyes.

Download (14KB)
5. Fig. 4. Fluorescence pattern of the biochip cells in the light of the Cy5 dye fluorescence with cells obtained from PEGMA by DSC activation and binding to Cy5-NH2, in the Cy5 channel with an exposure of 10 ms. The average signal of the cells with background signal subtraction was 46860 rel. units. The background signal was 140 rel. units. The graph of the signal distribution along the line drawn on the fluorescence image is shown.

Download (31KB)
6. Fig. 5. Scheme of Sav-Cy3 immobilization in PEGMA (n = 5–6) and HEMA (n = 1) cells activated with disuccinic carbonate (DSC) and binding to goat antibodies to hIgG-Bio-Cy5.

Download (14KB)
7. Fig. 7. Fluorescence pattern of PEGMA-derived biochip cells after Sav-Cy3 immobilization and binding to goat antibodies to hIgG-Bio-Cy5 in the Cy5 channel with an exposure of 8000 ms. The average cell signal after subtracting the background signal is 7600 rel. units. The background signal is 373 rel. units. The signal distribution graph in a row along the line drawn on the fluorescence image is shown.

Download (22KB)
8. Fig. 8. Scheme of immobilization of protein probes and specific binding to goat antibodies in biochip cells obtained from the HEMA-DMAPS-GMA mixture.

Download (29KB)
9. Fig. 9. Fluorescence pattern of biochip cells obtained from the HEMA-DMAPS-GMA mixture after immobilization of Sav-Cy3 on the Cy3 channel with an exposure of 8000 ms. The average cell signal after subtracting the background signal was 4610 rel. units. The background signal was 140 rel. units. The graph of signal distribution along the line drawn on the fluorescence image is shown.

Download (22KB)
10. Fig. 10. Fluorescence pattern of the biochip cells obtained from the HEMA-DMAPS-GMA mixture after immobilization of Sav-Cy3 and binding to goat antibodies to hIgG-Bio-Cy5 in the Cy5 channel with an exposure of 1000 ms. The average cell signal after subtracting the background signal was 12470 rel. units. The background signal was 107 rel. units. The graph of the signal distribution along the line in the fluorescence image is shown.

Download (22KB)
11. Fig. 11. Fluorescence pattern of the biochip cells obtained by photopolymerization of the HEMA-DMAPS-GMA monomer mixture after immobilization of hIgG-Cy3 in the Cy3 channel with an exposure of 1000 ms. The average cell signal after subtracting the background signal was 3490 rel. units. The background signal was 27 rel. units. A graph of the signal distribution along the line in the fluorescence image is shown.

Download (18KB)
12. Fig. 12. Fluorescence pattern of the biochip cells obtained by photopolymerization of the HEMA-DMAPS-GMA monomer mixture after immobilization of hIgG-Cy3 and binding to the developing goat antibodies to hIgG-Cy5 in the Cy5 channel with an exposure of 100 ms. The average cell signal after subtracting the background signal was 14,000 rel. units, the background signal was 139 rel. units. The graphs of the signal distribution along the line in the fluorescence image are shown.

Download (21KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences