Distribution and Numbers of European Earthworm Species in Irtysh Region Forests

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

In the forests of Siberia since the 80s of the last century, the spread of invasive species of earthworms of predominantly European origin was noted. The introduction of new species of lumbricids, which are “ecosystem engineers,” can lead to changes in forest communities and their ecosystem functions (climate regulating, water and soil protective, sanitary and hygienic, recreational). The purpose of this research is studying the distribution, association and tolerance of allochtonous species of earthworms of European origin in the forests of the Irtysh region. Main hypothesis: the occurrence of invasive species is determined by the range of tolerance to edaphic factors (content of organic substances, pH values, electrical conductivity, soil moisture and temperature). The studies were carried out during the growing seasons of 2018, 2022 and 2023 in Rudny Altai and in the south of the West Siberian plain. The total length of the study area is more than 1500 km, the number of sample sites is 65. Samples were taken via direct soil excavation. Overall, 306 samples were analysed, 1133 specimens of earthworms of invasive European species were identified. At each installation, soil conditions were measured layer by layer in each sample. To analyse the correlation between the occurrence of earthworms and their tolerance to edaphic factors, the range of data for each factor and the percentage areas in which each species was found were taken into account. In the Irtysh region, 6 invasive species were identified (Eisenia fetida, Aporrectodea handlirschi, Lumbricus rubellus, Octolasium lacteum, Dendrobaena octaedra, Eiseniella tetraedra) with the greatest extent (1450 km) and frequency of occurrence (43% of samples) belonging to Eisenia fetida – a species with a wide range of tolerance (85-100% of the range of the studied factors at the sites) to humidity, density, pH value and organic matter content. Factors limiting the distribution of the species in southern Siberia were not discovered. The least common (75 km) and rare (found in 2% of the sample) was Eiseniella tetraedra, a species with a narrow range of tolerance (5−22%) to all edaphic factors. The occurrence of invasive species correlates significantly with the range of their tolerance to soil organic matter content (r = 0.89) and soil density (r = 0.77). The ranges of tolerance to all invasive species according to experimental edaphic factors intersect with those of the native species, Eisenia nordenskioldi.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

E. Golovanova

Omsk State Pedagogical University; Omsk State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: nilseb@omgpu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Naberezhnaya Tukhachevskogo St. 14, Omsk, 644099; Mir Ave. 55a, Omsk, 644089

R. Romanchuk

Omsk State Pedagogical University; Omsk State University

Email: nilseb@omgpu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Naberezhnaya Tukhachevskogo St. 14, Omsk, 644099; Mir Ave. 55a, Omsk, 644089

V. Shcherbakov

Omsk State Pedagogical University; Omsk State University

Email: nilseb@omgpu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Naberezhnaya Tukhachevskogo St. 14, Omsk, 644099; Mir Ave. 55a, Omsk, 644089

S. Knyazev

Omsk State Pedagogical University

Email: nilseb@omgpu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Naberezhnaya Tukhachevskogo St. 14, Omsk, 644099

K. Babiy

Omsk State Pedagogical University

Email: nilseb@omgpu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Naberezhnaya Tukhachevskogo St. 14, Omsk, 644099

参考

  1. Atlas Omskoi oblasti (Atlas of the Omsk region), Moscow: Federal’naya sluzhba geodezii i kartografii Rossii, 1999, 58 p.
  2. Bagheri M., Azimi M., Khoshnamvand H., Abdoli A., Ahmadzadeh F., The threat of a non-native oligochaete species in Iran’s freshwater: Assessment of the diversity and origin of Eiseniella tetraedra (Savigny, 1826) and its response to climate change, Biology Open, 2023, Vol. 12, bio060180.
  3. Bazri K., Ouahrani G., Gheribi-Oulmi Z., Prigo D., Diaz Cosin D. J., Soil factors and earthworms in Eastern Algeria, Sciences and Technologie. C, Biotechnologies, 2013, Vol. 37, pp. 22—31.
  4. Briones M. J.I., The Serendipitous Value of Soil Fauna in Ecosystem Functioning: The Unexplained Explained, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2018, No. 6, pp. 149.
  5. Buckerfield J. C., Earthworm populations in dryland cropping soils under conservation-tillage in south Australia, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1992, Vol. 24, No. 12, pp. 1667—1672.
  6. Chernaya kniga flory Sibiri (Black list of flora of Siberia), Novosibirsk: Geo, 2016, 439 p.
  7. Das M. R., Nimbalkar A. C., Pisa S. S., Ecosystem Services of the Eco-Engineers: The Earthworms, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2018, No. 7, pp. 1065—1086.
  8. Daugbjerg P., Temperature and moisture preference of three earthworm species (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae), Pedobiologia, 1988, Vol. 32, pp. 57—64.
  9. De Sosa I., Marchán D. F., Novo M., Almodóvar A., Díaz Cosín D. J., Bless this phylogeographic mess — Comparative study of Eiseniella tetraedra (Annelida, Oligochaeta) between an Atlantic area and a continental Mediterranean area in Spain, European Journal of Soil Biology, 2017, Vol. 78, pp. 50—56.
  10. Demetrio W., Brown G., Pupin B., Novo R., Dudas R., Baretta D., Römbke J., Bartz M., Borma L., Are exotic earthworms threatening soil biodiversity in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest?, Applied Soil Ecology, 2023, Vol. 182, p. 104693.
  11. Edwards C. A., Arancon N. Q. The Influence of Environmental Factors on Earthworms, In: Biology and Ecology of Earthworms, Springer US, 2022b, pp. 191—232.
  12. Edwards C. A., Arancon N. Q., Earthworms, Soil Structure, Fertility, and Productivity, In: Biology and Ecology of Earthworms, New York, NY: Springer, 2022a, pp. 303—334.
  13. Falco L., Sandler R., Momo F., Di Ciocco C., Saravia L., Coviella C., Earthworm assemblages in different intensity of agricultural uses and their relation to edaphic variables, PeerJ, 2015, Vol. 3, p. e979.
  14. Ferlian O., Eisenhauer N., Aguirrebengoa M., Camara M., Ramirez‐Rojas I., Santos F., Tanalgo K., Thakur M. P., Invasive earthworms erode soil biodiversity: A meta‐analysis, Journal of Animal Ecology, 2017, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 162—172.
  15. Ferlian O., Thakur M. P., Castañeda González A., San Emeterio L. M., Marr S., Da Silva Rocha B., Eisenhauer N., Soil chemistry turned upside down: a meta‐analysis of invasive earthworm effects on soil chemical properties, Ecology, 2020, Vol. 101, No. 3, p. e02936.
  16. Gilyarov M. S., Metody pochvenno-zoologicheskikh issledovanii (Methods of soil-zoological research), Moscow: Nauka, 1975, 304 p.
  17. Golovanova E. V., Dozhdevye chervi Omskoi oblasti (Earthworms of the Omsk region), Fundamental’nye i prikladnye aspekty sovremennoi biologii (Fundamental and applied aspects of modern biology), Tomsk, Proc. of First All-Russian Young Scientists Conf., dedicated 125th anniversary of biol. research in Tomsk State university, Tomsk: TGU, Vol. 275, pp. 257—259.
  18. Golovanova E. V., Dozhdevye chervi-vselentsy v Zapadnoi Sibiri (Invading earthworms in Western Siberia), Ekologiya i evolyutsiya: novye gorizonty (Ecology and evolution: new horizons), Ekaterinburg, Proc. of the International symposium dedicated to 100th anniversary of academician S. S. Schwartz, Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyi universitet, pp. 494—495.
  19. Golovanova E. V., Kniazev S. Y., Babiy K. A., Tsvirko E. I., Karaban K., Solomatin D. V., Dispersal of earthworms from the Rudny Altai (Kazakhstan) into Western Siberia, Ecologica Montenegrina, 2021, Vol. 45, pp. 48—61.
  20. Golovanova E. V., Kniazev S. Y., Karaban K., Babiy K. A., Shekhovtsov S. V., First short-term study of the relationship between native and invasive earthworms in the zone of soil freezing in Western Siberia — Experiments in Mesocosms, Diversity, 2023, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 248.
  21. Golovanova E. V., Knyazev S. Y., Babii K. A., Tsvirko E. I., Rasprostranenie chuzherodnogo vida dozhdevykh chervei Aporrectodea caliginosa v estestvennykh mestoobitaniyakh Omskoi oblasti (Distribution of the alien species of earthworms Aporrectodea caliginosa in natural habitats of the Omsk region), Poznanie i deyatel’nost’: ot proshlogo k nastoyashchemu (Cognition and activity: from the past to the present), Omsk, Proc. of Second All-Russian interdisciplinary scientific Conf., Omsk, pp. 299—302.
  22. Golovanova E. V., Nakonechnyi N. V., Dozhdevye chervi krotovykh khodov okrestnostei goroda Tobol’ska (Earthworms of mole tunnels in the outskirts of the city of Tobolsk), Tobol’sk nauchnyi-2010 (Scientific Tobolsk-2010), Tobolsk, Proc. of All-Russian sci. and pract. Conf., Tobolsk: Poligrafist, pp. 11—12.
  23. Graff O., Investigations in soil zoology with special reference to the terricole Oligochaeta, Zeitschrift für Pfanzenernährung, Düngung, 1953, Vol. 61, pp. 72—77.
  24. Grant W. C., Studies on Moisture Relationships in Earthworms, Ecology, 1955, Vol. 36, No. 3, 400 p.
  25. Hendrix P. F., Callaham M. A., Drake J. M., Huang C.-Y., James S. W., Snyder B. A., Zhang W., Pandora’s Box Contained Bait: The Global Problem of Introduced Earthworms, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2008, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 593—613.
  26. Kapkhodzhaev M. K., Kotin M. I., Sokolov A. A., Pochvy Semipalatinskoi oblasti (Soils of the Semipalatinsk region), In: Pochvy Kazakhskoi SSR (Soils of Caucasian SSR), Alma-Ata, 1968, Vol. 10, 252 p.
  27. Klok C., Faber J., Heijmans G., Bodt J., Van Der Hout A., Influence of clay content and acidity of soil on development of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus and its population level consequences, Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2007, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 549—556.
  28. Kniazev S. Y., Kislyi A. A., Bogomolova I. N., Golovanova E. V., Territorial heterogeneity of the earthworm population (Opisthopora, Lumbricidae) of Omsk oblast and environmental factors: a quantitative assessment of the relationship, Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2022, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 484—493.
  29. Lavelle Ch., Burrowing activity of Aporrectodea rosea, Pedobiologia, 1998, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 97—101.
  30. Lavelle P., Spain A., Blouin M., Brown G., Decaëns T., Grimaldi M., Jiménez J. J., McKey D., Mathieu J., Velasquez E., Zangerlé A., Ecosystem Engineers in a Self-organized Soil: A Review of Concepts and Future Research Questions, Soil Science, 2016, Vol. 181, No. ¾, pp. 91—109.
  31. Lavrenko N. N., Geografiya rastitel’nogo pokrova Srednego Priirtysh’ya (v predelakh Omskoi oblasti). Diss. kand. geogr. nauk (Geography of vegetation cover of the Middle Irtysh region (within the Omsk region). Cand. geogr. sci. thesis), 1972, 25 p.
  32. Ljungström P., de Orellana J. A., Priano L. J.J., Influence of some edaphic factors on earthworm distribution in Santa Fe Province, Argentina, Pedobiologia, 1973, Vol. 13, pp. 236—247.
  33. Malyutina Y., Wilson G. W.T., Duell E. B., Loss S. R., Effects of native and non-native earthworms on grassland plant communities and abundance of associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Biological Invasions, 2023, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 455—470.
  34. Mathieu J., Reynolds J. W., Fragoso C., Hadly E., Multiple invasion routes have led to the pervasive introduction of earthworms in North America, Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2024, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 489—499.
  35. Mezhzherin S. V., Garbar A. V., Vlasenko R. P., Onishchuk I. P., Kotsyuba I. Y., Zhalai E. I., Evolyutsionnyi paradoks partenogeneticheskikh dozhdevykh chervei (The evolutionary paradox of parthenogenetic earthworms), Kiev: Naukova dumka, 2018, 232 p.
  36. Migge-Kleian S., McLean M.A., Maerz J. C., Heneghan L., The influence of invasive earthworms on indigenous fauna in ecosystems previously uninhabited by earthworms, Biological Invasions, 2006, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 1275—1285.
  37. Perel’ T.S., Osobennosti fauny dozhdevykh chervei (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) v Atlanticheskikh refugiumakh nemoral’noi rastitel’nosti (Features of the fauna of earthworms (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) in the Atlantic refugia of nemoral vegetation), Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR, 1985, Vol. 283, No. 3, pp. 752—755.
  38. Perel’ T.S., Rasprostranenie i zakonomernosti raspredeleniya dozhdevykh chervei fauny SSSR (Range and regularities in the distribution of earthworms of the USSR fauna), Moscow: Nauka, 1979, 275 p.
  39. Prokop’ev E.P., Rastitel’nyi pokrov poimy Irtysha (Vegetation cover of the Irtysh floodplain), Tomsk: TGU, 2012, 562 p.
  40. Ransom T. S., Local distribution of native and invasive earthworms and effects on a native salamander, Population Ecology, 2017, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 189—204.
  41. Roots B. I., The Water Relations of Earthworms. II. Resistance to desiccation and immersion, and behaviour when submerged and when allowed a choice of environment, Journal of Experimental Biology, 1956, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 29—44.
  42. Satchell J. E., Some aspects of earthworm ecology, Soil Zoology, 1955, pp. 180—201.
  43. Shekhovtsov S. V., Derzhinsky Ye.A., Poluboyarova T. V., Golovanova E. V., Ershov N. I., Berman D. I., Bulakhova N. A., Szederjesi T., Peltek S. E., Phylogeography and genetic lineages of Aporrectodea rosea (Lumbricidae, Annelida), European Journal of Soil Biology, 2020, Vol. 99, p. 103191.
  44. Shekhovtsov S. V., Geneticheskaya izmenchivost’ dozhdevykh chervei Rossii i ee otrazhenie v morfologii, filogenii i filogeografii. Diss. dokt. biol. nauk (Genetic variability of earthworms in Russia and its reflection in morphology, phylogeny and phylogeography. Doctor’s biol. sci. thesis), Moscow, 2023, 46 p.
  45. Shekhovtsov S. V., Golovanova E. V., Bazarova N. E., Belova Y. N., Berman D. I., Derzhinskii E. A., Shashkov M. P., Pel’tek S.E., Geneticheskoe raznoobrazie vidov kompleksa Aporrectodea caliginosa na territorii Rossii (Genetic diversity of the Aporrectodea caliginosa complex in Russia), Vavilovskii zhurnal genetiki i selektsii, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 374—379.
  46. Shekhovtsov S. V., Golovanova E. V., Peltek S. E., Different dispersal histories of lineages of the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa (Lumbricidae, Annelida) in the Palearctic, Biological Invasions, 2016, Vol. 18, pp. 751—761.
  47. Shekhovtsov S. V., Golovanova E. V., Peltek S. E., Genetic diversity of the earthworm Octolasion tyrtaeum (Lumbricidae, Annelida), Pedobiologia, 2014, Vol. 57, pp. 245—250.
  48. Shelford V. E., Animal Communities in Temperate America as Illustrated in the Chicago region, Geographic Society of Chicago, 1913, Bull. No. 5, 362 p.
  49. Stebaev I. V., Volkovintser V. V., Zhivotnoe naselenie pochv severnoi chasti Barabinskoi lesostepi i vodnyi rezhim pochv (Animal population of soils in the northern part of the Barabinsk forest-steppe and soil water regime), Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 1964, Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 1425—1439.
  50. Striganova B. R., Poryadina N. M., Zhivotnoe naselenie pochv boreal’nykh lesov Zapadno-Sibirskoi ravniny (Soil animal population in boreal forests of West-Siberian Plain), Moscow: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdanii KMK, 2005, 234 p.
  51. Vinogradova Y. K., Maiorov S. R., Khorun L. V., Chernaya kniga flory Srednei Rossii (Chuzherodnye vidy rastenii v ekosistemakh Srednei Rossii) (Black Book of the Flora of Central Russia (Non-native plant species in the ecosystems of Central Russia)), Moscow: GEOS, 2009, 496 p.
  52. Vsevolodova-Perel’ T.S., Dozhdevye chervi fauny Rossii: Kadastr i opredelitel’ (Earthworms of Russian fauna: inventory and key), Moscow: Nauka, 1997, 102 p.
  53. Winsome T., Epstein L., Hendrix P. F., Horwath W. R., Competitive interactions between native and exotic earthworm species as influenced by habitat quality in a California grassland, Applied Soil Ecology, 2006, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 38—53.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Distribution of species of earthworms - European omnivores in Priirtyshye. Zonality: I - Steppe zone, northern subzone, II - Southern subzone of small birch-trees (southern forest-steppe), III - Central subzone of medium birch-trees (central forest-steppe), IV - Northern subzone of large birch-trees (northern forest-steppe), V - Zone of small-leaved forests (subtaiga), VI - Zone of mixed forests, VII - Zone of coniferous forests (southern taiga).

下载 (114KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Earthworm numbers depending on soil factors (regression analysis, R2 - approximation coefficient).

下载 (54KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Tolerance ranges of earthworm species to soil factors (PCA analysis). PC1 is principal component 1, PC2 is principal component 2. The length of the vector corresponds to the correlation value of the edaphic factor with the principal components. The planes reflect the ranges of tolerance of earthworm species by a set of edaphic factors.

下载 (55KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. Correlation of earthworm species occurrence and width of species tolerance ranges: a) - to soil density, kg/m3; b) - to organic matter content, %.

下载 (29KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024