<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Journal of Modern Oncology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Modern Oncology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Современная онкология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1815-1434</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1815-1442</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">LLC Obyedinennaya Redaktsiya</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">70512</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26442/18151434.2021.1.200745</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL ONCOLOGY</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКАЯ ОНКОЛОГИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The role of positron emission tomography in different types of malignant lymphomas: the results of 2020</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Роль позитронно-эмиссионной томографии при различных вариантах злокачественных лимфом: итоги 2020 года</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7164-6595</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sarzhevskiy</surname><given-names>Vladislav O.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Саржевский</surname><given-names>Владислав Олегович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D. Sci. (Med.)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Доктор мед. наук, проф. каф. гематологии и клеточной терапии</p></bio><email>vladsar100@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7716-5896</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mukhortova</surname><given-names>Olga V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мухортова</surname><given-names>Ольга Валентиновна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D. Sci. (Med.)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Доктор мед. наук, проф. каф. лучевой диагностики, вед. науч. сотр. отд-ния позитронно-эмиссионной томографии отд. ядерной диагностики</p></bio><email>vladsar100@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медико-хирургический центр им. Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр сердечно-сосудистой хирургии им. А.Н. Бакулева» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-05-19" publication-format="electronic"><day>19</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>192</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-05-12"><day>12</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2021-05-12"><day>12</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2021, Consilium Medicum</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2021, ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://modernonco.orscience.ru/1815-1434/article/view/70512">https://modernonco.orscience.ru/1815-1434/article/view/70512</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The review presents the results of studies published in 2020 concerning the role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the diagnosis of different types of malignant lymphomas. The authors tried to highlight the current trends in the development of the PET method in case of Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and multiple myeloma. The topic concerning the use of PET in immunotherapy is highlighted separately. There was also an emphasis on the interpretation of quantitative imaging biomarkers used in PET. The concept of PET-adapted approach in Hodgkin lymphoma, the predictive significance of PET before high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, predictive value of intermediate PET in case of follicular lymphoma, the application of methionine as PET tracer to diagnose tumor burden and to measure minimal residual disease in case of multiple myeloma, the variants of atypical tumor response to the immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy, PET in diagnosing immune-mediated adverse events are currently relevant for oncologists, hematologists, radiologists and discussed in this article. In the context of the topics the authors showed the results of PET imaging of Russian patients who had PET examination in the Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В обзоре представлены результаты исследований, опубликованных в 2020 г. и касающихся роли позитронно-эмиссионной томографии (ПЭТ) в диагностике различных вариантов злокачественных лимфом. Авторы постарались выделить современные тенденции развития метода ПЭТ при лимфоме Ходжкина, диффузной В-крупноклеточной лимфоме, фолликулярной лимфоме и множественной миеломе. Отдельно освещена тема использования ПЭТ при иммунотерапии. Также сделан акцент на интерпретации количественных биомаркеров, оцениваемых при ПЭТ. Концепция ПЭТ-адаптированного подхода при лимфоме Ходжкина, прогностическая значимость ПЭТ перед высокодозной химиотерапией с трансплантацией аутологичных гемопоэтических стволовых клеток у пациентов с диффузной В-крупноклеточной лимфомой, прогностическая ценность промежуточной ПЭТ при фолликулярной лимфоме, использование метионина в качестве радиофармпрепарата для диагностики распространения опухоли и оценки минимальной остаточной болезни при множественной миеломе, варианты атипичного ответа опухоли на терапию ингибиторами иммунных контрольных точек, ПЭТ в диагностике иммуноопосредованных нежелательных явлений – темы, актуальные для онкологов, гематологов, радиологов и обсуждаемые в данной статье. В контексте обсуждаемых тем авторы приводят результаты исследований российских пациентов, проходивших ПЭТ-диагностику в ФГБУ «НМИЦ ССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева» Минздрава России.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>malignant lymphomas</kwd><kwd>positron emission tomography</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>злокачественные лимфомы</kwd><kwd>позитронно-эмиссионная томография</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Borchmann P. Positron Emission Tomography guided Omission of Radiotherapy in Early-stage Unfavorable Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Results of the International, Randomized Phase III HD17 Trial by the GHSG. EHA 25th, p1, abstr S101.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Fuchs M, Plütschow A, Kobe C, et al. Prognostic Impact of PET after 2 Cycles of Escalated Beacopp Plus 2 Cycles of ABVD on Progression Free Survival in Early Unfavourable Hodgkin Lymphoma within the Phase 3 GHSG HD17 Trial. ASH 62th, 2020, abstr 2065.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Casasnovas O, Racape J, Dechene J, et al. PET-Guided Strategy Improves the Safety of Beacopp-Based Treatment in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: Prolonged Follow-up of the Lysa AHL 2011 Phase 3 Study. ASH 62th, 2020, abstr 475.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, et al. Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation as Compared with Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapses of Chemotherapy-sensitive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1995; 333 (23): 1540–5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199512073332305</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Brown R, Lambertini A, Hofman MS, et al. Evaluating the PET Parameters SUVmax and TMTV in the Setting of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for DLBCL. ASH 62th, 2020, abstr 3039.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Alderuccio JP, Kuker RA, Barreto-Coelho P, et al. Prognostic Value of PET/CT Metrics in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: An Intent-to-Treat Analysis. ASH 62th, 2020, abstr 1209.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Josting A, Sieniawski M, Glossmann J-P, et al. High-dose sequential chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of a multicenter phase II study. Ann Oncol 2005; 16 (8): 1359–65. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi248</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Cherng H-JJ, Steiner RE, Fayad L,et al. Persistent Overall Response on Early PET/CT Scans during Salvage Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL Predicts for Disease Specific Survival. ASH 62th, 2020, abstr 3053.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Iacoboni PG, Simo M, Villacampa G, et al. Prognostic Impact of Metabolic Tumor Burden in Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients Receiving CAR T-Cell Therapy. ASH 62th, 2020, abstr 1220.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Trotman J, Barrington SF, Belada D, et al. Prognostic value of end-of-induction PET response after first-line immunochemotherapy for follicular lymphoma (GALLIUM): secondary analysis of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19 (11): 1530–42. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30618-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Merryman RW, Spilberg G, Mondello P, et al. Interim Positron Emission Tomography (iPET) Assessed Using Deauville Score for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma Receiving First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy. ASH 62th, 2020, abstr 2936.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Mondello P, Strati P, Merryman RW, et al. R-CHOP Versus R-Bendamustine with or without Rituximab Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma Patients with High SUV at Baseline PET. ASH 62th, 2020, abstr 2041.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Morales-Lozano MI, Viering O, Samnick S, et al. 18 F-FDG and 11C-Methionine PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison of Volume-Based PET Biomarkers. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12 (4): 1042. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12041042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Nanni C, Versari A, Chauvie S, et al. Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45 (5): 712–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3909-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Cavo M, Terpos E, Nanni C, et al. Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18 (4): e206–e217. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30189-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Zamagni E, Nanni C, Gay F, et al. Impact of Imaging FDG-PET/CT Minimal Residual Disease Assessment on Outcomes and Matching with Bone Marrow Techniques in Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: Results of the Phase II Randomized Forte Trial. ASH 62th, 2020, abstr 3326.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Armand P, Engert A, Younes A, et al. Nivolumab for Relapsed/Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma After Failure of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Extended Follow-Up of the Multicohort Single-Arm Phase II CheckMate 205 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36 (14): 1428–39. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.0793</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Chen R, Zinzani P, Fanale M, et al. Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab for Relapsed/Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35 (19): 2125–32. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1316</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Cheson BD, Ansell S, Schwartz L, et al. Refinement of the Lugano Classification lymphoma response criteria in the era of immunomodulatory therapy. Blood 2016; 128 (21). DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-718528</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Mokrane F-Z, Chen A, Schwartz LH, et al. Performance of CT Compared with 18F-FDG PET in Predicting the Efficacy of Nivolumab in Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma. Radiology 2020; 295 (3): 651-61. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Champiat S, Dercle L, Ammari S, et al. Hyperprogressive Disease Is a New Pattern of Progression in Cancer Patients Treated by Anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23 (8): 1920–8. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1741.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
