<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Journal of Modern Oncology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Modern Oncology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Современная онкология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1815-1434</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1815-1442</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">LLC Obyedinennaya Redaktsiya</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">702035</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26442/18151434.2026.1.203646</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">First experience of robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Retrospective study</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Первый опыт роботических малоинвазивных резекций при раке пищевода. Ретроспективное исследование</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-8809</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">56681139700</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">7403-1161</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sekhniaidze</surname><given-names>Dmitrii D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сехниаидзе</surname><given-names>Дмитрий Даниелович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Sci. (Med.)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук, зав. отд-нием торакальной хирургии</p></bio><email>skirrr@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7278-8525</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">3155-6227</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Erygin</surname><given-names>Dmitriy V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ерыгин</surname><given-names>Дмитрий Валерьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D. Sci. (Med.)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, зав. онкологическим отд-нием №2</p></bio><email>skirrr@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9243-6068</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kanner</surname><given-names>Dmitriy Y.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Каннер</surname><given-names>Дмитрий Юрьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Sci. (Med.)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук, глав. врач</p></bio><email>skirrr@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1801-7623</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Blinov</surname><given-names>Dmitrii A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Блинов</surname><given-names>Дмитрий Александрович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Thoracic Surgeon</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач – торакальный хирург торакального отд-ния</p></bio><email>skirrr@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6426-756X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Agasiev</surname><given-names>Malik V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Агасиев</surname><given-names>Малик Вагифович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Thoracic Surgeon</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач – торакальный хирург торакального отд-ния</p></bio><email>skirrr@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГБУЗ г. Москвы «Московская городская онкологическая больница №62» Департамента здравоохранения г. Москвы</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department"</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГБУЗ г. Москвы «Городская клиническая больница им. С.С. Юдина Департамента здравоохранения г. Москвы»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-08" publication-format="electronic"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>6</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-02-03"><day>03</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-04-01"><day>01</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2026, Consilium Medicum</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2026, ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Consilium Medicum</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Консилиум Медикум"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://modernonco.orscience.ru/1815-1434/article/view/702035">https://modernonco.orscience.ru/1815-1434/article/view/702035</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Background.</bold> Over the past 10 to 15 years, robot-assisted esophageal resections have transitioned from an experimental technique to a significant component of surgical management for esophageal cancer. International experience has demonstrated that this approach achieves oncological outcomes comparable to those of open and conventional minimally invasive procedures, while also reducing postoperative complications.</p> <p><bold>Aim.</bold> To evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer using robot-assisted minimally invasive resections.</p> <p><bold>Materials and methods.</bold> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 13 patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer who underwent surgery between 2024 and 2025. All patients received Lewis and McKeown robot-assisted minimally invasive esophageal resections. The DaVinci Xi robotic platform was utilized during the thoracic stage in all cases. At the abdominal stage, both robotic and standard laparoscopic approaches were employed, with one patient requiring a laparotomy.</p> <p><bold>Results.</bold> The mean duration of surgery was 424.2 ± 132.2 minutes (95% confidence interval: 344.2–504.1). Median intraoperative blood loss was 96.2 mL (interquartile range: 50–100). The median intensive care unit stay following surgery was 3 days (interquartile range: 1–2.5). Postoperatively, pneumonia was the most frequent complication, occurring in three patients (23%). The most severe complication was esophagogastric anastomosis dehiscence, observed in two patients (15%). In one case (7.7%), esophagogastric anastomosis dehiscence following Lewis surgery resulted in death.</p> <p><bold>Conclusion.</bold> Robot-assisted resection for esophageal cancer represents an advanced and promising surgical approach that integrates oncological radicality with enhanced safety.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Актуальность.</bold> Робот-ассистированные резекции пищевода за последние 10–15 лет превратились из экспериментальной методики в важную часть арсенала хирургов при лечении рака пищевода. В зарубежной практике продемонстрированы сопоставимые онкологические результаты с открытыми и классическими малоинвазивными операциями при снижении количества послеоперационных осложнений.</p> <p><bold>Цель.</bold> Оценить результаты хирургического лечения пациентов, страдающих раком пищевода, при использовании робот-ассистированных малоинвазивных резекций.</p> <p><bold>Материалы и методы.</bold> В ретроспективный анализ включены результаты лечения 13 больных раком внутригрудного отдела пищевода, прооперированных в 2024–2025 гг. Всем пациентам выполнены робот-ассистированные малоинвазивные резекции пищевода по типу Льюиса и МакКеона. Во всех случаях на торакальном этапе использовалась роботическая платформа DaVinci Xi, на абдоминальном этапе применялись доступы как с использованием роботической системы, так и стандартный лапароскопический доступ; кроме того, в 1 случае выполнена лапаротомия.</p> <p><bold>Результаты.</bold> Средняя продолжительность хирургического вмешательства – 424,2 ± 132,2 мин (95% доверительный интервал 344,2–504,1). Интраоперационная кровопотеря составила 96,2 мл (Q1–Q3 50–100). Период нахождения в отделении реанимации после операции – 3 сут (Q1–Q3 1-2,5). В послеоперационном периоде самым частым осложнением явилась пневмония, которая зафиксирована у 3 (23%) пациентов. Наиболее тяжелым осложнением стала несостоятельность эзофагогастроанастомоза, развившаяся в 2 (15%) случаях. В 1 (7,7%) случае, после операции Льюиса, несостоятельность эзофагогастроанастомоза привела к летальному исходу.</p> <p><bold>Заключение.</bold> Робот-ассистированные резекции при раке пищевода представляют собой высокотехнологичный и перспективный метод, сочетающий онкологическую радикальность и безопасность.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>esophageal cancer</kwd><kwd>Da Vinci Xi robotic system</kwd><kwd>minimally invasive surgical interventions</kwd><kwd>esophageal resection</kwd><kwd>esophagogastric anastomosis</kwd><kwd>standard laparoscopic access</kwd><kwd>intraoperative blood loss</kwd><kwd>postoperative complications</kwd><kwd>esophagogastric anastomosis dehiscence</kwd><kwd>laparoscopy</kwd><kwd>surgery</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак пищевода</kwd><kwd>роботическая система Da Vinci Xi</kwd><kwd>малоинвазивные хирургические вмешательства</kwd><kwd>резекция пищевода</kwd><kwd>эзофагогастроанастомоз</kwd><kwd>стандартный лапароскопический доступ</kwd><kwd>интраоперационная кровопотеря</kwd><kwd>послеоперационные осложнения</kwd><kwd>несостоятельность эзофагогастроанастомоза</kwd><kwd>лапароскопия</kwd><kwd>хирургия</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Kooij C, Goense L, Feike Kingma B, et al. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Current Best Practice. Dig Surg. 2025;42(4):204-12. DOI:10.1159/000546749</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Gritsiuta A, Petrov R. The rise of robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a game-changer or just an added cost – a narrative review. Ann Esophagus. 2025;8. DOI:10.21037/aoe-25-10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Zhou J, Xu J, Chen L, et al. McKeown esophagectomy: robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive technique-systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2022;35(10):doac011. DOI:10.1093/dote/doac011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Watanabe M, Otake R, Kozuki R, et al. Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2020;50(1):12-20. DOI:10.1007/s00595-019-01878-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Watanabe M, Kuriyama K, Terayama M et al. Robotic-assisted esophagectomy: current situation and future perspectives. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;29(4): 168-76. DOI:10.5761/atcs.ra.23-00064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Biere SSAY, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: A multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887-92. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;101: 1281-9. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang Y, Han Y, Gan Q, et al. Early outcomes of robot-assisted versus thoracoscopic-assisted ivor lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1284-91. DOI:10.1245/s10434-019-07273-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Sarkaria IS, Rizk NP, Goldman DA, et al. Early quality of life outcomes after robotic-assisted minimally invasive and open esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108:920-8. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.075</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Tagkalos E, Goense L, Hoppe-Lotichius M, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: A propensity-matched analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2019;33:doz060. DOI:10.1093/dote/doz060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>van der Sluis PC, Tagkalos E, Hadzijusufovic E, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis (ivor lewis): promising results in 100 consecutive patients (the European experience). Gastrointest Surg. 2020;25:1-8. DOI:10.1007/s11605-019-04510-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269:621-30. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Merboth F, Hasanovic J, Stange D, et al. Strategiewechsel zur minimal-invasiven Ösophagektomie–Ergebnisse an einem zertifizierten Zentrum. Die Chir. 2021;93:694-701. DOI:10.1007/s00104-021-01550-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Angeramo CA, Harriott CB, Casas MA, et al. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: robot-assisted versus laparoscopic–thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2021;170:1692-701. DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Yang Y, Li B, Yi J, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2021;275:646-53. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005023</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
